We're updating the issue view to help you get more done. 

Review possibly redundant or contradictory ways a family member may be indicated as a member of a family

Description

E.g. if a patient record is added to a family outside of pedigree editor by not using internal APIs (e.g. via a data pull script for CLIN) a family member may end up being linked to a family, but not being mentioned in the pedigree even as an "unlinked" member, which introduces potential inconsistencies. Those can be fixed via a migration so it is not an immediate problem, but need ot discuss what takes priority: pedigree (if present), links via XWiki objects or "either or"

Relates to PT-3379, commit fe7461f44335

If (when) is extended to modify pedigree as well, and if only those APIs are used then there is no problem

Environment

None

Status

Assignee

Andrew Misyura

Reporter

Andrew Misyura

Labels

None

External issue ID

None

External issue ID

None

Epic Link

Priority

Medium