Uploaded image for project: 'PhenoTips'
  1. PT-3697

Review possibly redundant or contradictory ways a family member may be indicated as a member of a family

    Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      E.g. if a patient record is added to a family outside of pedigree editor by not using internal APIs (e.g. via a data pull script for CLIN) a family member may end up being linked to a family, but not being mentioned in the pedigree even as an "unlinked" member, which introduces potential inconsistencies. Those can be fixed via a migration so it is not an immediate problem, but need ot discuss what takes priority: pedigree (if present), links via XWiki objects or "either or"

      Relates to PT-3379 Closed , commit fe7461f44335

      If (when) PT-3699 Closed is extended to modify pedigree as well, and if only those APIs are used then there is no problem

        Attachments

          Issue links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                asm Andriy Misyura
                Reporter:
                asm Andriy Misyura
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: